Wearable step cadence during chemotherapy and survival

In 213 people on chemotherapy, faster peak walking cadence on a Fitbit was linked to lower mortality (HR 0.87 per 10 steps/min). Preliminary data.

In a single-centre cohort of 213 people receiving outpatient chemotherapy, faster peak walking cadence on a Fitbit was associated with lower mortality after adjustment for clinical factors including age, cancer stage and performance status (hazard ratio 0.87 per 10 steps per minute, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.98). Daily step count was not independently associated. This small, preliminary observational study cannot show that changing cadence changes outcomes.

What did the chemotherapy wearable study measure?

The study by Low and colleagues in JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics enrolled 213 people with solid tumours at one NCI-designated cancer centre (206 had usable Fitbit data). Participants wore a Fitbit Inspire 2 or 3 for up to 90 days during outpatient chemotherapy and were followed for a median of 2.53 years. During follow-up, 90 people died.

The three measures were daily step count, peak gait cadence (the fastest one-minute walking pace) and activity fragmentation (how often someone switches from active to sedentary).

Before adjustment, all three were associated with survival, including higher step count (hazard ratio 0.87 per 1,000 steps). After adjusting for age, cancer stage, cancer type, clinician-rated performance status and patient-reported physical function, step count dropped out. Peak cadence (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.98) and fragmentation (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.04) stayed associated.

How much weight can these findings carry?

Not a great deal yet. The authors call the results preliminary. The sample was relatively small and mixed in cancer types and treatment history. Cause of death was not recorded, comorbidities were not assessed, and physical function was not measured by a performance test.

Enrolment was also limited to people with smartphones who could read and write in English, which the authors say may have selected people with better clinical outcomes.

An observational design also cannot separate a cause from a marker. A slower pace may simply reflect how unwell someone already is, which adjustment for stage and performance status can only partly capture.

For step counts in the general population, see the research on 7,000 versus 10,000 steps.

The bottom line

  • In 213 people on outpatient chemotherapy, faster peak walking cadence on a Fitbit was associated with lower mortality after adjustment (HR 0.87 per 10 steps per minute).
  • Daily step count lost its statistical association after adjustment, while cadence and activity fragmentation remained associated.
  • This is a small single-centre observational study with selection limits, and the authors describe it as preliminary.

Frequently asked questions

Is walking cadence linked to survival during chemotherapy?
In one single-centre cohort of 213 people, faster peak cadence was associated with lower mortality after adjustment (hazard ratio 0.87 per 10 steps per minute, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.98). This is an association from a small observational study, and the authors describe the evidence as preliminary.
Is daily step count linked to survival during chemotherapy?
In the same study, higher daily step count was associated with lower mortality before adjustment (hazard ratio 0.87 per 1,000 steps). That association was no longer statistically significant once age, cancer stage and type, performance status and physical function were accounted for, while cadence and activity fragmentation remained associated.

Sources

  1. Low CA, Bartel C, Durica K, Donovan HS, Thomas R, Fedor J, 2025. Consumer Wearable Device Measures of Gait Cadence and Activity Fragmentation as Predictors of Survival among Patients undergoing Chemotherapy. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics 9:e2500111 (PMC author manuscript).

Hydra's editorial team. We write from primary research and cite every study we rely on, with its year and journal. We quantify claims wherever the evidence allows and state plainly where it does not: where a finding rests on a small or single trial, we say so in the text rather than in a footnote.